ILO Convention on Asbestos Usage – ILO in 1986 unanimously adopted the Convention on the Safe Use of Asbestos and the entire organized sector of the Industry in India is strictly following the recommendations/guidelines of ILO. ILO guidelines have been suitably incorporated in the 16 standards laid down by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) for the Asbestos Industry and also in the relevant section of Factories Act covering Occupational health of workers engaged in this Industry.
Click here for BIS Standards
WHO 1998 Publication on “Chrysotile Asbestos – Environmental Health Criteria 203 - WHO in its publication on “Chrysotile Asbestos – Environmental Health Criteria 203 has recommended the following on controlled use and further research:
Para 10(d) – Page 144
“Control measures, including engineering controls and work practices, should be used in circumstances where occupational exposure to Chrysotile can occur. Data from industries where control technologies have been applied have demonstrated the feasibility of controlling exposure to levels generally below 0.5 f/ml. Personal protective equipment can further reduce individual exposure where engineering controls and work practices prove insufficient”.
Para 11 (a) – Page 145
“Research and guidance are needed concerning the economic and practical feasibility of substitution for chrysotile asbestos, as well as the use of engineering controls and work practices in developing countries for controlling asbestos exposure”.
WHO Guidelines on Drinking Water Quality - WHO in 1993 undertook an exercise to lay down the acceptable concentration of various chemicals in drinking water. While WHO has specified the concentration levels for Arsenic, Barium etc. they have concluded that “ there is no consistent evidence that ingested asbestos is hazardous to health and thus it was concluded that there was no need to establish a health-based guideline value for asbestos in drinking water.”
Relevant extract from WHO Publication of 1993 “Guidelines for drinking water quality” – Second Edition Volume I on acceptable values in respect of Asbestos and Barium are given for comparative study.
Asbestos - Asbestos is introduced into water by the dissolution of asbestos-containing minerals and ores as well as from industrial effluents, atmospheric pollution, and asbestos-cement pipes in the distribution system. Exfoliation of asbestos fibres from asbestos-cement pipes is related to the aggressiveness of the water supply. Limited data indicate that exposure to airborne asbestos released from tap water during showers or humidification is negligible.
There has been little convincing evidence of the carcinogenicity of ingested asbestos in epidemiological studies of populations with drinking water supplies containing high concentrations of asbestos. Moreover, in extensive studies in animal species, asbestos has not consistently increased the incidence of tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. There is, therefore, no consistent evidence that ingested asbestos is hazardous to health, and thus it was concluded that there was no need to establish a health-based guideline value for asbestos in drinking water .
The following extract of Ann 2 table (A2.3) to the Guidelines of drinking water quality is given below:
Table A2.3 – Chemicals not of health significance at concentration normally found in drinking water
| Chemical |
Remarks |
| Asbestos |
U |
| Silver |
U |
| Tin |
U |
U – It is unnecessary to recommend a health-based guideline value for these compounds because they are not hazardous to human health at concentrations normally found in drinking water.
